Gender Dynamics in the Planning Workplace

Problem, research strategy, and findings: Planners’ workplaces are diversifying with respect to gender, but office culture and policies do not always reflect such change. Our research explores the influence of gender, management, and organizational characteristics on planners’ perceptions of workplace culture and benefits. We conducted a national survey with the APA’s Women and Planning Division in 2015 to assess whether planners’ perceptions regarding workplace culture and benefits differ by gender and organizational characteristics of the planning office. A limitation of the survey is the small self-selected sample of mostly female respondents. We combine feminist planning theory with workplace psychology theories of expectation states, role congruity, and representative bureaucracy, as well as transformational leadership, to explain workplace dynamics in planning agencies. Qualitative analysis shows problems with exclusive communication and equal opportunity are linked to management characteristics. To test this, we build five regression models on gender respect, exclusive communication, work–life benefits, flexibility perception, and equal opportunity. Our regression models control for gender, age, experience of respondent, and organizational characteristics. Our results indicate that gender respect, work–life benefits, and flexibility perception do not differ by gender. However, women are less likely to feel heard in their workplace (exclusive communication) or perceive equal opportunity. Workplaces with female management are more likely to show sensitivity to gender issues, support for flexible benefits, and equal opportunity for pay and advancement. Takeaway for practice: These results suggest planners feel they can raise gender issues and access flexibility benefits without prejudice. But planning workplaces need to address problems with exclusive communication and women’s perceptions of unequal opportunities for pay and advancement. Introducing gender-inclusive planning and leadership development curriculum to planning programs would prepare future planners; and ongoing training for management may improve behavior, communication, and benefits for all genders in planning workplaces.

Tags
Data and Resources
To access the resources you must log in

This item has no data

Identity

Description: The Identity category includes attributes that support the identification of the resource.

Field Value
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11961924
PID https://www.doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1691041
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11961924.v1
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/01944363.2019.1691041
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/01944363.2019.1691041
URL https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/3010810608
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11961924.v1
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.11961924
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2019.1691041
Access Modality

Description: The Access Modality category includes attributes that report the modality of exploitation of the resource.

Field Value
Access Right Open Access
Attribution

Description: Authorships and contributors

Field Value
Author Turesky, Marisa
Author Warner, Mildred E., 0000-0002-0109-338X
Publishing

Description: Attributes about the publishing venue (e.g. journal) and deposit location (e.g. repository)

Field Value
Collected From ORCID; Datacite; figshare; Crossref; Microsoft Academic Graph
Hosted By figshare; Journal of the American Planning Association
Publication Date 2020-03-10
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Additional Info
Field Value
Language UNKNOWN
Resource Type Other literature type; Article
keyword FOS: Chemical sciences
keyword FOS: Health sciences
keyword keywords.Geography, Planning and Development
keyword FOS: Biological sciences
system:type publication
Management Info
Field Value
Source https://science-innovation-policy.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::a1c02e3e68cc395e1baffc0fd9fb4f5b
Author jsonws_user
Last Updated 26 December 2020, 19:07 (CET)
Created 26 December 2020, 19:07 (CET)