Categories and numbers of survey participants1.

A long-standing goal shared by researchers has been to design optimal experimental procedures, including the selection of appropriate stimuli. Pictures are commonly used in...

ARAS-P multivariate analysis (1–5 scale).

The usefulness of the 3D Portable Document Format (PDF) for clinical, educational, and research purposes has recently been shown. However, the lack of a simple tool for...

Detailed questions from survey used in Thuermer et al., 2018

Mean number of responses (and SD) obtained per image condition and mean ratings (and SD) of arousal, disgust and valence in each image condition when no context was presented.

Comparison of AAS6, AAS5, and AAS10.

Mean (and Standard Deviation) for name agreement scores (%NA and H) and familiarity ratings for each category and each sample.

Mean number of responses (and SD) obtained per image and mean ratings (and SD) of arousal, disgust and valence in each encoding context.

ARAS-S multivariate analyses (1–5 scale).

Characteristics of multiple myeloma inpatients.

In this paper we present the latest CMS open data release published on the CERN Open Data portal. The samples of raw datasets, collision and simulated datasets were released...

WordCommentsAnalyzer facilitates organization and analysis of codes for researchers interested in using Word for data annotation. It is free and open-source and provides basic...

Summary statistics for the name agreement scores (%NA and H values) and familiarity ratings, given by the North American and the two Portuguese samples.

Proportion of naming failures (DKO, DKN and TOT responses), in each sample.

Purpose and species scales and confidence in animal research translatability versus response to survey question AAS-6b, “I do not think that there is anything wrong with using...

Responses underlying ARAS-P and ARAS-S (1–5 scales)1.