-
Trends in IFBSCP since 1987 (all scientific fields combined).
Trends in IFBSCP since 1987 (all scientific fields combined). -
Data related to "Effective Publication Strategies in Clinical Research"
Data and supplementary material in support of "Deutz, D.B., Vlachos, E., Drongstrup, D., Dorch, B.F., Wien, C. (2019). Effective Publication Strategies in Clinical... -
Respondents’ mean ratings of factors affecting publication decisions compared...
Factors are ordered from greatest to least difference between self and peer perceptions. Higher means for a given variable are highlighted for emphasis. -
r37980778c78--f05e6611095647d4255908ed94ad20c4
Association of journal characteristics with domain endorsement in 2015 and random effects accounting for publisher or domain-specific variation, type and model quality§, for... -
Endorsement of domains in author instructions in 2015.
Endorsement of domains in author instructions in 2015. -
Questionnaire score and various IFs of 27 mathematical journals.
Questionnaire score and various IFs of 27 mathematical journals. -
r37980778c78--cc64e78d48e76c13cb415250b36dcc44
Topic keyword coefficients omitted; t-statistics in parentheses. -
Questionnaire score and various IFs of 30 ophthalmologic journals.
Questionnaire score and various IFs of 30 ophthalmologic journals. -
Journals with the most number of articles in the sample.
Journals with the most number of articles in the sample. -
Diagnostic accuracy research in glaucoma is still incompletely reported: An a...
BackgroundResearch has shown a modest adherence of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies in glaucoma to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD). We... -
Share of uncited articles in off- and on-Academia samples, by cohort.
Share of uncited articles in off- and on-Academia samples, by cohort. -
Dataset of 'An indicator of journal impact that is based on calculating a jou...
Supplementary material 1: Database with the values of the impact indicators -
r37980778c78--ed43b82420652d992c3b4bac7209bc6a
Guidance followed by the raters to judge the included studies with the reasons for “yes” and “no”. -
r37980778c78--74e2b8a6d3abdb5aecab1f8170510b87
To correct the incongruence of document types between the numerator and denominator in the traditional impact factor (IF), we make a corresponding adjustment to its formula and... -
r37980778c78--a560afc2233f567ba1943dd5373b50bd
Correlations between questionnaire score and various IFs of 27 mathematical journals.