Note: The second column shows the determinants of use of any coping strategies, the next seven analyze the use of specific coping strategies. *is significant at 10%, **...

Aaron HJ, Schwartz WB, editors (2004) Coping with methuselah. Washington (District of Columbia): Brookings Institution Press. 296 pp. ISBN (paperback) 0-8157-0039-3. US$19.95.

Table shows significant betas from Table 5.

Note: the correlation coefficient in bracket was the correlation between different specific coping styles and general factor or self-efficacy; *p<0.05; **p<0.01.

Numbers are “odds ratio (p-value)”. “Baseline” represents the reference group for OR calculation. Sample size  = 5070.

Df = 2, 993 for the causes; df = 2, 1011 for the coping maxims. Superscripts indicate significance of pairwise comparisons in rows. Same letter means no significant difference....

Background The Brief Coping Orientation to Problems Experienced (Brief COPE) inventory is the most usual measure to identify the nature of coping strategies implemented by...

Factor analysis of coping maxims.

Note: the correlation coefficient in bracket was the correlation for different specific coping styles. SF problem solving  =  specific factor for problem solving, and the rest...