With the economic development of China, air pollutants are also growing rapidly in recent decades, especially in big cities of the country. To understand the relationship...

Supporting Appendixes. (DOC)

For each species richness, the landscape scale with the lowest AIC value is shown in bold. A blank space means that the variable is not included in the best model....

aCategories are: adopted the most pro-environmental behaviours (++), adopted slightly fewer (+), adopted much fewer (−) and adopted the fewest (−).

* P<0.05; ** P<0.01.

Explained inertia by each dimension for group A: Indoor Index, 2007.

ObjectiveThe adoption of pro-environmental behaviours reduces anthropogenic environmental impacts and subsequent human health effects. This study developed composite indices...

* p<0.05.

aCategories are: adopted the most pro-environmental behaviours (++), adopted slightly fewer (+), adopted much fewer (−) and adopted the fewest (−).

CI: confident interval; Percentage was derived by the number of geographic units for each race level divided by the total number of counties at each geographic division.

Q  =  Q-test for heterogeneity (including P value); ES  =  effect size point estimate; SE  =  standard error; Z  =  two-tail Z-test; 95%CI Lower  =  lower confidence interval...

Note. Income was measured in units of $NZ 10,000. Distance from respondent address to nearest point on coast was scored in 10 km units. Height above sea level was scored in...

CI: confident interval; Percentage was derived by the number of geographic units for each education level divided by the total number of counties at each geographic division.

*Reference category for comparison based on existing studies in the environmental justice literature. **The classification standard for income is detailed in the text.

CI: confident interval; Percentage was derived by the number of geographic units for each age level divided by the total number of counties at each geographic division.

aCategories are: adopted the most pro-environmental behaviours (++), adopted slightly fewer (+), adopted much fewer (−) and adopted the fewest (−).

CI: confident interval; Percentage was derived by the number of geographic units for low income level divided by the total number of counties at each geographic division.

Explained inertia by each dimension for group B: Outdoor Index, 2007.