-
r37980778c78--b7617866ff3a1c081f02a4fef3bb8316
where, SDRA was average splash detachment rate under crop canopy, g/m2·h; LAI was leaf area index; TIA was average throughfall intensity under crop canopy, mm/h. -
File S1 - Market Forces and Technological Substitutes Cause Fluctuations in t...
Contains the following: Table S1 Cotton extent and Mexican free-tailed bat population size per county from 1990 through 2008. Table S2 Upland and Pima cotton price over time.... -
Comparison of all species and high-impact species by sector.
Only predictors (Table 1) that differed between sectors (see text) are included. Statistical analysis was only possible for environmental and pastoral weeds, and only for a... -
Best models predicting high-impact species using a statistical learning appro...
Model weighting assumption was tested by comparing true positives and false negatives equally (w = 0.5) (comparable to Table 2) and weighting true positives more heavily than... -
Best models predicting spread rate, model performance measured by AICc.
Model performance was measured by AICc, with log(spr.rate) as the response. For all models the random effect is (1|genus). ΔAICc is the difference in AICc between the top ranked... -
Splash detachment and throughfall under crop canopy in different growth stage.
Splash detachment and throughfall under crop canopy in different growth stage. -
Predictors tested or excluded from model-fitting analyses.
See text for details of the analysis. Genus was always used as a random effect. Predictors only included in the spread rate analysis are indicated by asterisks. -
Distribution of splash erosion under crop canopy in whole growth stage.
Distribution of splash erosion under crop canopy in whole growth stage.