Does the transfer of a poor quality embryo together with a good quality embryo affect the In Vitro Fertilization (IVF) outcome?

Abstract Background IVF cycles which result in only one good quality embryo, and a second poor quality embryo present a dilemma when the decision involves transferring two embryos. The aim of this study was to evaluate whether a poor quality embryo has a negative effect on a good quality embryo when transferred along with a good quality embryo. Methods We retrospectively evaluated in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles involving single embryo transfers (SET) and double embryo transfers (DET). Embryo quality was divided into poor “P” and good “G” quality. The main outcome measures were: live birth, implantation rate, miscarriage rate, clinical pregnancy rate and multiple pregnancy ratio. Results Six hundred three women were included. The study group consisted of 180 (29.9%) patients who had a double embryo transfer (DET) with one poor quality embryo and one good quality embryo (P + G). Control 1 group included 303 (50.2%) patients who had DET with two good quality embryos (G + G), and control 2 group consisted of 120 (19.9%) patients who had a single embryo transfer (SET) with one good quality embryo (G). Live birth rates were not significantly different when compared between study groups: 30.8% in the SET group (G), 27.2% in the (G + P) group and 33.7% in the (G + G) group. The SET group had the highest implantation rate (33.9%) compared to the DET groups (21.8% (G + P), 25.4% (G + G)) (P =0.022). The clinical pregnancy rate was 33.3% in the SET group (G), 33.3% in the (G + P) group, and 39.3% in the (G + G) group (P =0.39). The miscarriage rate was comparable in all groups. Conclusion A poor quality embryo does not negatively affect a good quality embryo, when transferred together in a double embryo transfer.

Tags
Data and Resources
To access the resources you must log in

This item has no data

Identity

Description: The Identity category includes attributes that support the identification of the resource.

Field Value
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3665644
PID https://www.doi.org/10.26226/morressier.5af300ae738ab10027aa940f
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3665644.v1
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3665644
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3665644.v1
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.26226/morressier.5af300ae738ab10027aa940f
Access Modality

Description: The Access Modality category includes attributes that report the modality of exploitation of the resource.

Field Value
Access Right not available
Attribution

Description: Authorships and contributors

Field Value
Author Wintner, Eliana
Author Hershko-Klement, Anat
Author Tzadikevitch, Keren
Author Yehudith Ghetler
Author Gonen, Ofer
Author Wintner, Oren
Author Shulman, Adrian
Author Wiser, Amir
Publishing

Description: Attributes about the publishing venue (e.g. journal) and deposit location (e.g. repository)

Field Value
Collected From Datacite
Hosted By figshare
Publication Date 2017-01-01
Publisher Figshare
Additional Info
Field Value
Format application/pdf
Language UNKNOWN
Resource Type Collection; Other ORP type
keyword FOS: Chemical sciences
keyword FOS: Mathematics
keyword FOS: Biological sciences
system:type other
Management Info
Field Value
Source https://science-innovation-policy.openaire.eu/search/other?orpId=dedup_wf_001::fc0505c6fd74272ca015e374de95365c
Author jsonws_user
Last Updated 19 December 2020, 22:49 (CET)
Created 19 December 2020, 22:49 (CET)