Uses, toxicity levels, and environmental impacts of synthetic and natural pesticides in rice fields – a survey in Central Thailand

Nowadays, pesticides are used pervasively in Asian rice production areas. Nonetheless, information is scarce regarding chemicals’ application and synergistic toxicity and longer-term impacts on paddy ecosystems. In Phranakhon Si Ayutthaya and Ang Tong (AT) provinces, 40 conventionally and 31 organically managed farms were visited. The farmers provided information on types and levels of pesticides used, and indices describing pesticide ‘toxic exposures’ were calculated. In the dry and wet seasons, the fields were surveyed for soil organic carbon (OC) and nitrogen (N) and rice densities and sizes. Using multivariate statistics, interrelationships among variables were investigated. Overall, 12 types of herbicides (all synthetic), 27 insecticides (13 natural), and 6 molluscicides (1 natural) were recorded. Pesticide exposures differed between provinces; organic farms used more natural products. OC was positively correlated with ‘toxic exposure’ levels, probably resulting from effects of pesticides on carbon-reducing processes. Additionally, molluscicides and herbicides explained OC levels. N varied spatially, probably resulting from flooding regimes; management influences were unnoticeable. In the dry season, rice growth was decreased on fields exposed to plentiful synthetic insecticides, whereas in the wet season, use of herbicides and molluscicides enhanced the growth. Further research is advisable to better establish long-term costs and benefits of different pesticide regimes in rice fields.

Tags
Data and Resources
To access the resources you must log in

This item has no data

Identity

Description: The Identity category includes attributes that support the identification of the resource.

Field Value
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1007653.v1
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1007653.v3
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1007653.v2
PID https://www.doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2014.905493
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1007653
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1007653.v2
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1007653.v3
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21513732.2014.905493
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1007653
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1007653.v1
URL https://core.ac.uk/display/150589386
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21513732.2014.905493
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/21513732.2014.905493?needAccess=true
URL https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/1976965757
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/21513732.2014.905493
Access Modality

Description: The Access Modality category includes attributes that report the modality of exploitation of the resource.

Field Value
Access Right Open Access
Attribution

Description: Authorships and contributors

Field Value
Author Suthamma Maneepitak
Author Cochard, Roland
Publishing

Description: Attributes about the publishing venue (e.g. journal) and deposit location (e.g. repository)

Field Value
Collected From Datacite; figshare; UnpayWall; Crossref; Microsoft Academic Graph
Hosted By figshare; International Journal of Biodiversity Science, Ecosystem Services & Management
Publication Date 2014-01-01
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Additional Info
Field Value
Language UNKNOWN
Resource Type Other literature type; Article
keyword FOS: Chemical sciences
keyword keywords.Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
keyword FOS: Biological sciences
keyword FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences
keyword keywords.Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics
system:type publication
Management Info
Field Value
Source https://science-innovation-policy.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::f6f3540aee6c89ad4c334ae972a5ea3a
Author jsonws_user
Last Updated 26 December 2020, 03:41 (CET)
Created 26 December 2020, 03:41 (CET)