Systematic review of dengue vaccine efficacy

Abstract Background Dengue is an arbovirus that has rapidly spread worldwide, and the incidence of dengue has greatly increased in recent decades. The actual numbers of dengue cases are underreported, and many cases are not classified correctly. Recent estimates indicate that 390 million dengue infections occur per year (95% CI, 284–528 million), of which 96 million (67–136 million) are symptomatic infections of any severity. One of the goals of the World Health Organization is to reduce dengue mortality by 50% by the year 2020. The use of a vaccine can be an important strategy to achieve this goal. Vaccines for dengue are in various stages of development; in Brazil, only one commercial formulation is available (CYD-TDV), which was developed by Sanofi Pasteur. Methods To evaluate the efficacy of Dengue vaccine, a systematic review with a meta-analysis was conducted using randomized controlled clinical trials published between 2000 and 2017 that were identified in the MEDLINE databases via PubMed, LILACS, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE. The selection was performed by two reviewers independently, with disagreements resolved by a third reviewer. Results Seven clinical trials were included, with a total of 36,371 participants (66,511 person-years) between the ages of 2 and 45 years. The meta-analysis using the random-effects model estimated the efficacy of the vaccine at 44%, with a range from 25 to 59% and high heterogeneity (I2 = 80.1%). The serotype-stratified meta-analysis was homogeneous, except for serotype 2, with the heterogeneity of 64.5%. Most of the vaccinated individuals had previous immunity for at least one serotype, which generated safety concerns in individuals without previous immunity. Conclusions Compared with other commercially available vaccines, the dengue vaccine showed poor efficacy.

Tags
Data and Resources
To access the resources you must log in

This item has no data

Identity

Description: The Identity category includes attributes that support the identification of the resource.

Field Value
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4646063
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4646063.v1
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4646063
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4646063.v1
Access Modality

Description: The Access Modality category includes attributes that report the modality of exploitation of the resource.

Field Value
Access Right not available
Attribution

Description: Authorships and contributors

Field Value
Author Silveira, Lucia
Author Tura, Bernardo
Author Santos, Marisa
Publishing

Description: Attributes about the publishing venue (e.g. journal) and deposit location (e.g. repository)

Field Value
Collected From Datacite
Hosted By figshare
Publication Date 2019-01-01
Publisher figshare
Additional Info
Field Value
Language UNKNOWN
Resource Type Collection
keyword FOS: Mathematics
keyword FOS: Clinical medicine
keyword FOS: Health sciences
system:type other
Management Info
Field Value
Source https://science-innovation-policy.openaire.eu/search/other?orpId=dedup_wf_001::f42f2bfffdab9da03870153bb0db4823
Author jsonws_user
Last Updated 19 December 2020, 13:57 (CET)
Created 19 December 2020, 13:57 (CET)