A meta-analysis of the efficacy of venlafaxine extended release 75–225 mg/day for the treatment of major depressive disorder

Objective: To evaluate the short-term efficacy of venlafaxine extended release (ER) 75–225 mg/day compared with placebo for treating major depressive disorder (MDD) and to examine associations between baseline characteristics and efficacy outcomes in MDD patients treated with venlafaxine ER 75–225 mg/day. Research design and methods: This meta-analysis included published and unpublished short-term, double-blind, placebo-controlled, Wyeth/Pfizer sponsored studies of venlafaxine ER at doses up to 225 mg/day in adults with MDD. Clinical trial registration: All trials were conducted before trial registration became mandatory. Main outcome measures: Change from baseline in the 17-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HAM-D17) total score was analyzed over time using a mixed-effects model for repeated measures with terms for study, treatment group, visit, interaction between treatment group and visit, and baseline score as a covariate. Associations between baseline demographic and clinical characteristics and the probability of HAM-D17 response and remission at week 8 were evaluated using logistic regression models, with terms for study, treatment group, and baseline characteristics in the models. Safety and tolerability was assessed based on adverse events (AEs) and discontinuations due to AEs. Results: The full analysis set included 1087 patients from five studies that fulfilled selection criteria. Statistically significant separation between venlafaxine ER and placebo groups for HAM-D17 total score was seen at week 2 and all subsequent assessments (p-values 17 total score. Probability of HAM-D17 remission at week 8 decreased with increasing baseline HAM-D17 total score (p = .0012; OR: 0.94); however, baseline HAM-D17 total score did not predict response. Discontinuations due to AEs were reported for 9.4% of venlafaxine-ER-treated patients compared with 3.6% of placebo-treated patients. Key limitations: Five studies met the criteria for inclusion. Several differences in design between included studies limited the analysis: one study did not include a week 3 assessment (the week 3 time point was therefore dropped from the analysis), one study had two venlafaxine ER dose arms, which were combined into one group for the meta-analysis, and mixed- and flexible-dose studies were pooled. Conclusions: Venlafaxine ER 75–225 mg/day effectively reduced symptoms of depression in patients with MDD overall and in patients with either lower (≤23) or higher (>23) HAM-D17 total score at baseline.

Tags
Data and Resources
To access the resources you must log in

This item has no data

Identity

Description: The Identity category includes attributes that support the identification of the resource.

Field Value
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4130121.v2
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4130121
PID https://www.doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2016.1255185
URL https://core.ac.uk/display/149684933
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/03007995.2016.1255185
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4130121
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03007995.2016.1255185
URL http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/03007995.2016.1255185
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.4130121.v2
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03007995.2016.1255185
URL https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2545262119
Access Modality

Description: The Access Modality category includes attributes that report the modality of exploitation of the resource.

Field Value
Access Right Open Access
Attribution

Description: Authorships and contributors

Field Value
Author Thase, Michael
Author Asami, Yuko
Author Wajsbrot, Dalia
Author Dorries, Kathleen
Author Boucher, Matthieu
Author Pappadopulos, Elizabeth
Publishing

Description: Attributes about the publishing venue (e.g. journal) and deposit location (e.g. repository)

Field Value
Collected From Datacite; figshare; Crossref; Microsoft Academic Graph
Hosted By figshare; Current Medical Research and Opinion
Publication Date 2016-11-28
Publisher Taylor & Francis
Additional Info
Field Value
Language UNKNOWN
Resource Type Other literature type; Article
keyword FOS: Chemical sciences
keyword FOS: Clinical medicine
keyword FOS: Health sciences
system:type publication
Management Info
Field Value
Source https://science-innovation-policy.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::eda8872a95b473f3f89f07b3c3b1c111
Author jsonws_user
Last Updated 21 December 2020, 19:38 (CET)
Created 21 December 2020, 19:38 (CET)