Dealing with Cultural Issues in the Triple Helix Model Implementation: A Comparison Among Government, University and Business Culture

Abstract Implementing a model to foster the interaction among Government, Academy and Business seems to require more than the model definition and the expected operational programming and budgeting. The concept of Triple Helix as innovation strategy is based in the participation and collaboration of three entities with different objectives, being a common goal setting considered as the means for harmonization of the cultural diversity involved in the activities of the three partners. While Government Policies, Norms and Regulations works in a cultural environment characterized by structured guidelines, compulsory duties and control, University activities are guided by the knowledge creation and diffusion usually taking advantage of the open environment prevailing. Business culture has as main difference the profit orientation and the efficiency search in order to create value to the shareholders. Under these different objectives, Governments are economic development oriented, Universities are knowledge oriented and Businesses are profit oriented, representing three cultural operational environments. To understand the complexities of the cultures that must work together to foster innovation results, a research study was conducted using Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions as a main analytical framework to identify the culture characteristics of each one of the parties involved in a Triple Helix operational Model.

Tags
Data and Resources
To access the resources you must log in

This item has no data

Identity

Description: The Identity category includes attributes that support the identification of the resource.

Field Value
PID https://www.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.438
URL https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1877042812038931?httpAccept=text/plain
URL https://core.ac.uk/display/82249287
URL https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2058239360
URL https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.438
URL https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812038931
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.438
URL https://api.elsevier.com/content/article/PII:S1877042812038931?httpAccept=text/xml
URL http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1877042812038931
Access Modality

Description: The Access Modality category includes attributes that report the modality of exploitation of the resource.

Field Value
Access Right Open Access
Attribution

Description: Authorships and contributors

Field Value
Author Erosa, Victoria E.
Publishing

Description: Attributes about the publishing venue (e.g. journal) and deposit location (e.g. repository)

Field Value
Collected From UnpayWall; BASE (Open Access Aggregator); Crossref; Microsoft Academic Graph; CORE (RIOXX-UK Aggregator)
Hosted By BASE (Open Access Aggregator); Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences; Elsevier
Journal Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 52,
Publication Date 2012-01-01
Publisher Elsevier BV
Additional Info
Field Value
Language UNKNOWN
Resource Type Article
system:type publication
Management Info
Field Value
Source https://science-innovation-policy.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::ea324b3d5a26c507c813dee00c14b779
Author jsonws_user
Last Updated 26 December 2020, 01:09 (CET)
Created 26 December 2020, 01:09 (CET)