dedup_wf_001--bd8063a00414401dd54be754a5504853

© 2018, © 2018 British Society of Audiology, International Society of Audiology, and Nordic Audiological Society. Self-help has the potential to provide low-cost and effective ways of improving access to psychological support for people with tinnitus. When developing and evaluating resources it is important to consider issues that may influence successful implementation. This Survey explored clinicians’ use and views on self-help, and barriers to implementation. An online survey was distributed to 220 UK audiology departments. One-hundred and twenty-four clinicians responded to the survey (91 audiologists, 32 hearing therapists, 1 clinical psychologist), each representing a different tinnitus department. Two-thirds of respondents reported providing or recommending self-help resources. Potential benefits were patient empowerment and providing a means of engaging patients in their care. Almost half of respondents felt that there is insufficient training or guidance for clinicians on using or promoting self-help. Clinicians felt that for patients with low-level tinnitus severity, self-help may reduce the number of audiology appointments required. For patients with more complex needs self-help may be useful to engage with between clinical appointments. Further research is needed to determine effectiveness, who benefits, and by what mechanism, before clinicians can confidently recommend or implement self-help. Clinicians will benefit from formal guidance on promoting and supporting use of self-help for tinnitus.

Tags
Data and Resources
To access the resources you must log in

This item has no data

Identity

Description: The Identity category includes attributes that support the identification of the resource.

Field Value
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7145624.v1
PID https://www.doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1512013
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7145624
URL https://nottingham-repository.worktribe.com/1417189/1/Smith Et Al Accepted Manuscript 09AUG2018
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/pdf/10.1080/14992027.2018.1512013
URL https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/14992027.2018.1512013
URL https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/424786/
URL https://academic.microsoft.com/#/detail/2893711142
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7145624
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.7145624.v1
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14992027.2018.1512013
URL https://eprints.soton.ac.uk/424786/1/Smith_et_al_Clinician_view_on_self_management_accepted_manuscript.docx
Access Modality

Description: The Access Modality category includes attributes that report the modality of exploitation of the resource.

Field Value
Access Right Open Access
Attribution

Description: Authorships and contributors

Field Value
Author Sandra N Smith, 0000-0001-5710-1062
Author Emily Broomhead
Author Kate Greenwell, 0000-0002-3662-1488
Author Emily Watts
Author David Stockdale
Author Derek J Hoare, 0000-0002-8768-1392
Publishing

Description: Attributes about the publishing venue (e.g. journal) and deposit location (e.g. repository)

Field Value
Collected From ORCID; figshare; Datacite; UnpayWall; e-Prints Soton; Crossref; Microsoft Academic Graph; CORE (RIOXX-UK Aggregator)
Hosted By figshare; e-Prints Soton; International Journal of Audiology; Nottingham Research Repository
Publication Date 2018-09-27
Additional Info
Field Value
Country United Kingdom
Format Word; text
Language UNKNOWN
Resource Type Other literature type; Article
keyword FOS: Health sciences
keyword FOS: Biological sciences
keyword FOS: Computer and information sciences
system:type publication
Management Info
Field Value
Source https://science-innovation-policy.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::bd8063a00414401dd54be754a5504853
Author jsonws_user
Last Updated 26 December 2020, 12:23 (CET)
Created 26 December 2020, 12:23 (CET)