How do junior doctors in the UK learn to provide end of life care: a qualitative evaluation of postgraduate education

Abstract Background The fundamental importance of good end of life care has been well documented however recent national publications have high-lighted inadequacies in training in this area. For many patients dying in the UK today care is provided in hospital and the number of inpatient deaths is forecast to climb significantly in future. The demands of providing medical care for these patients by junior doctors will continue to rise. However, there is currently only limited research on training for doctors in this setting. Methods A qualitative study using semi-structured interviews of trainees working in general medicine analysed utilising a grounded theory approach. Results Eleven medical trainees from nine different medical schools participated. They had worked in fifteen different UK hospitals in the course of their careers. All of the doctors interviewed felt generally confident in managing a dying patient. This had developed at postgraduate level and increased when working in certain key specialties. Emerging themes fell into five main categories: perceived ability in clinical management, different learning opportunities experienced, the impact of variations in approach to end of life care, the role of the specialist palliative care team and suggestions for improvements to training. All participants felt further teaching would be beneficial. Conclusions This study identified key areas where training could be improved. This included small changes in everyday practice to shift the emphasis for trainees to education. There also needs to be focus on end of life care in the curriculum, formal teaching programmes and assessment of junior doctors. The specialist palliative care team played a vital role in training as well as service provision. For those working in this specialty, every clinical encounter provides an opportunity for education. Specifically targeting junior doctors will not only improve patient care today but empower the consultants of the future.

Tags
Data and Resources
To access the resources you must log in

This item has no data

Identity

Description: The Identity category includes attributes that support the identification of the resource.

Field Value
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3640787
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3640787.v1
URL https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3640787
URL https://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3640787.v1
Access Modality

Description: The Access Modality category includes attributes that report the modality of exploitation of the resource.

Field Value
Access Right not available
Attribution

Description: Authorships and contributors

Field Value
Author Price, Sophie
Author Schofield, Susie
Publishing

Description: Attributes about the publishing venue (e.g. journal) and deposit location (e.g. repository)

Field Value
Collected From Datacite
Hosted By figshare
Publication Date 2016-12-15
Publisher Figshare
Additional Info
Field Value
Language Undetermined
Resource Type Dataset
keyword FOS: Sociology
keyword FOS: Biological sciences
system:type dataset
Management Info
Field Value
Source https://science-innovation-policy.openaire.eu/search/dataset?datasetId=dedup_wf_001::9f98170b6d50c4e52227b6341146ae34
Author jsonws_user
Last Updated 14 January 2021, 13:23 (CET)
Created 14 January 2021, 13:23 (CET)