Good practice statements on safe laboratory testing: A mixed methods study by the LINNEAUS collaboration on patient safety in primary care

ABSTRACTBackground: The systems-based management of laboratory test ordering and results handling is a known source of error in primary care settings worldwide. The consequences are wide-ranging for patients (e.g. avoidable harm or poor care experience), general practitioners (e.g. delayed clinical decision making and potential medico-legal implications) and the primary care organization (e.g. increased allocation of resources to problem-solve and dealing with complaints). Guidance is required to assist care teams to minimize associated risks and improve patient safety.Objective: To identify, develop and build expert consensus on ‘good practice’ guidance statements to inform the implementation of safe systems for ordering laboratory tests and managing results in European primary care settings.Methods: Mixed methods studies were undertaken in the UK and Ireland, and the findings were triangulated to develop ‘good practice’ statements. Expert consensus was then sought on the findings at the wider European level via a Delphi group meeting during 2013.Results: We based consensus on 10 safety domains and developed 77 related ‘good practice’ statements (≥ 80% agreement levels) judged to be essential to creating safety and minimizing risks in laboratory test ordering and subsequent results handling systems in international primary care.Conclusion: Guidance was developed for improving patient safety in this important area of primary care practice. We need to consider how this guidance can be made accessible to frontline care teams, utilized by clinical educators and improvement advisers, implemented by decision makers and evaluated to determine acceptability, feasibility and impacts on patient safety.

Tags
Data and Resources
To access the resources you must log in

This item has no data

Identity

Description: The Identity category includes attributes that support the identification of the resource.

Field Value
PID https://www.doi.org/10.3109/13814788.2015.1043724
PID pmc:PMC4828633
PID pmid:26339831
PID handle:2066/152268
PID urn:urn:nbn:nl:ui:22-2066/152268
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1568556.v1
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1568556.v2
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1568556
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1568556.v2
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1568556
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/13814788.2015.1043724
URL http://hdl.handle.net/2066/152268
URL http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4828633
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.1568556.v1
Access Modality

Description: The Access Modality category includes attributes that report the modality of exploitation of the resource.

Field Value
Access Right Open Access
Attribution

Description: Authorships and contributors

Field Value
Author Bowie, P.
Author Forrest, E.
Author Price, J.
Author Verstappen, W.H.J.M.
Author Cunningham, D.
Author Halley, L.
Author Grant, S.
Author Kelly, M.
Author McKay, J.
Publishing

Description: Attributes about the publishing venue (e.g. journal) and deposit location (e.g. repository)

Field Value
Collected From PubMed Central; Datacite; figshare; NARCIS
Hosted By Europe PubMed Central; figshare; Radboud Repository; NARCIS
Journal The European Journal of General Practice, 21, sup1
Publication Date 2015-01-01
Publisher Informa Healthcare
Additional Info
Field Value
Country Netherlands
Format application/pdf
Language English
Resource Type Other literature type; Article
system:type publication
Management Info
Field Value
Source https://science-innovation-policy.openaire.eu/search/publication?articleId=dedup_wf_001::668a5e1694dd90d6ef88f3e56dd303d8
Author jsonws_user
Last Updated 26 December 2020, 05:03 (CET)
Created 26 December 2020, 05:03 (CET)