Patients' preferences for involvement in the decision-making process for treating diabetic retinopathy

Abstract Background To assess factors associated with the preferred role of the attending ophthalmologist in the decision-making processes before treating diabetic retinopathy (DR). Methods Cross-sectional study of 810 adults attending secondary diabetes care centers (NCT02311504). Diabetes patients were classified using a validated questionnaire in an ophthalmologist-dominant decision-making (ODM), shared decision-making (SDM) and patient-dominant decision-making (PDM) style. Multivariate logistic regression was performed to determine factors associated with the decision-making process. Results A majority of 74.3% patients preferred SDM between ophthalmologist and patient, 17.4% patients wanted ODM, delegating the decision-making process to the ophthalmologist, 8.3% preferred the autonomous style of PDM. Patients wanting ODM were older (OR = 1.2 per decade, p = 0.013), had a lower level of education (OR = 1.4, p = 0.001) and had a higher frequency of consultations per year (OR = 1.3, p = 0.022). Patients with better basic knowledge in DR and memorizing their HbA1c level showed a higher propensity for SDM (OR = 1.1, p = 0.037). Patients wanting PDM had a significantly higher education (OR = 1.3, p = 0.036) and a greater desire for receiving information from self-help groups (OR = 1.3, p = 0.015). Conclusions The first evaluation of the general patient wishes for the treatment of DR confirmed the concept of SDM, which was favored by three quarters. In particular, older patients with low educational attainment wanted to delegate the decision-making process to the ophthalmologist. Amelioration of ophthalmologic education in diabetic programs might take up patients’ propensity for SDM. Regardless of the decision-making group, nearly all patients wanted the medical and scientific information to be transferred by and shared with the ophthalmologist. Trial registration The study was registered on www.clinicaltrials.gov (identifier: NCT02311504) on December 4th 2014.

Tags
Data and Resources
To access the resources you must log in

This item has no data

Identity

Description: The Identity category includes attributes that support the identification of the resource.

Field Value
PID https://www.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-30773
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3849511.v1
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3849511
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.15496/publikation-30773
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3849511.v1
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.3849511
Access Modality

Description: The Access Modality category includes attributes that report the modality of exploitation of the resource.

Field Value
Access Right Closed Access
Embargo End Date 2019-06-05
Attribution

Description: Authorships and contributors

Field Value
Author Marahrens, Lydia
Author Kern, Raimar
Author Tjalf Ziemssen
Author Fritsche, Andreas
Author Martus, Peter
Author Ziemssen, Focke
Author Roeck, Daniel
Contributor University, My
Publishing

Description: Attributes about the publishing venue (e.g. journal) and deposit location (e.g. repository)

Field Value
Collected From Datacite
Hosted By figshare
Publication Date 2017-01-01
Publisher Biomed Central Ltd
Additional Info
Field Value
Language English
Resource Type Collection; Other ORP type
keyword FOS: Biological sciences
keyword FOS: Clinical medicine
keyword FOS: Health sciences
system:type other
Management Info
Field Value
Source https://science-innovation-policy.openaire.eu/search/other?orpId=dedup_wf_001::3027e5cc8beb74240c0fa7d6e1a7b7bc
Author jsonws_user
Last Updated 20 December 2020, 02:34 (CET)
Created 20 December 2020, 02:34 (CET)