Wanting to or having to – a qualitative study of experiences and attitudes towards migrant screening for tuberculosis in Norway

Abstract Background This study assesses how tuberculosis (TB) screening is perceived by immigrants in Norway. Screening is mandatory for people arriving from high incidence countries. To attend screening, immigrants have to contact the health system after receiving an invitation by letter. The proportion of non-attenders is not known, and there are no sanctions for not attending. Generally, only persons who test positive receive test results. The study explores users’ experiences, attitudes and motivations for attending or not attending TB screening, and perceived barriers and enablers. Methods We conducted six focus group discussions and three individual interviews with 34 people from 16 countries in Africa, Asia and Europe. Interviews were recorded and transcribed, and data was coded following a general inductive approach: All transcribed text data was closely read through, salient themes were identified and categories were created and labelled. The data was read through several times and the category system was subsequently revised. Results Most appreciated the opportunity to be tested for a severe disease and were generally positive towards the healthcare system. At the same time, many were uncomfortable with screening, particularly due to the fear and stigma attached to TB. All experienced practical problems related to language, information, and accessing facilities. Having to ask others for help made them feel dependent and vulnerable. Positive and negative attitudes simultaneously created ambivalence. Many wanted “structuring measures” like sanctions to help attendance. Many said that not receiving results left them feeling anxious. Conclusions In order to adapt the system and improve trust and patient uptake, all aspects of the screening should be taken into account. Ambivalence towards screening probably has a negative impact on screening uptake and should be sought reduced. A combination of ambivalence and a wish for “structuring measures” leads the authors to conclude that mandatory screening is a reasonable measure. However, since mandatory screening negatively impacts patient autonomy, and because of fear, stigma and practical problems, the health system should empower users by improving communication and access to services. In addition, it is recommended that negative test results are also communicated to the users.

Tags
Data and Resources
To access the resources you must log in

This item has no data

Identity

Description: The Identity category includes attributes that support the identification of the resource.

Field Value
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4551554.v1
PID https://www.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4551554
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4551554.v1
URL http://hdl.handle.net/11250/2619925
URL http://dx.doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.c.4551554
Access Modality

Description: The Access Modality category includes attributes that report the modality of exploitation of the resource.

Field Value
Access Right Open Access
Attribution

Description: Authorships and contributors

Field Value
Author Nordstoga, Ingunn
Author Drage, Mona
Author Steen, Tore
Author Winje, Brita
Publishing

Description: Attributes about the publishing venue (e.g. journal) and deposit location (e.g. repository)

Field Value
Collected From Datacite; Norwegian Open Research Archives
Hosted By figshare; Norwegian Open Research Archives
Publication Date 2019-01-01
Publisher Figshare
Additional Info
Field Value
Language UNKNOWN
Resource Type Collection; Other ORP type
keyword FOS: Sociology
keyword FOS: Biological sciences
keyword FOS: Earth and related environmental sciences
system:type other
Management Info
Field Value
Source https://science-innovation-policy.openaire.eu/search/other?orpId=dedup_wf_001::0eabdcc8c594c48057e199781bc2f52f
Author jsonws_user
Last Updated 20 December 2020, 03:10 (CET)
Created 20 December 2020, 03:10 (CET)