-
File S1 - Landscape Heterogeneity–Biodiversity Relationship: Effect of Range ...
Supporting Appendixes. (DOC) -
<i>Z</i> values (estimates/standard errors) of linear (L) and quadratic (Q) t...
For each species richness, the landscape scale with the lowest AIC value is shown in bold. A blank space means that the variable is not included in the best model.... -
r37980778c78--018b1e1080d8f5adb8b8f6cf1856c9a8
aCategories are: adopted the most pro-environmental behaviours (++), adopted slightly fewer (+), adopted much fewer (−) and adopted the fewest (−). -
Explained inertia by each dimension for group A: Indoor Index, 2007.
Explained inertia by each dimension for group A: Indoor Index, 2007. -
Development of Composite Indices to Measure the Adoption of Pro-Environmental...
ObjectiveThe adoption of pro-environmental behaviours reduces anthropogenic environmental impacts and subsequent human health effects. This study developed composite indices... -
r37980778c78--a19f8487a8f7f3bcfe24fc0919e0fc09
aCategories are: adopted the most pro-environmental behaviours (++), adopted slightly fewer (+), adopted much fewer (−) and adopted the fewest (−). -
Frequency of <i>OR</i>s greater than 1 by race at the county level in the Uni...
CI: confident interval; Percentage was derived by the number of geographic units for each race level divided by the total number of counties at each geographic division. -
Summary of the meta-analysis.
Q = Q-test for heterogeneity (including P value); ES = effect size point estimate; SE = standard error; Z = two-tail Z-test; 95%CI Lower = lower confidence interval... -
r37980778c78--e241b9aa1ee3cbcb9278fb8b8d77a12d
Note. Income was measured in units of $NZ 10,000. Distance from respondent address to nearest point on coast was scored in 10 km units. Height above sea level was scored in... -
Frequency of <i>OR</i>s greater than 1 by educational attainment at the count...
CI: confident interval; Percentage was derived by the number of geographic units for each education level divided by the total number of counties at each geographic division. -
Standards of categorization and reference categories for socio-demographic me...
*Reference category for comparison based on existing studies in the environmental justice literature. **The classification standard for income is detailed in the text. -
r37980778c78--8543fdbfbaee53e859d81cd19d2f631a
CI: confident interval; Percentage was derived by the number of geographic units for each age level divided by the total number of counties at each geographic division. -
Coordinates and categories of pro-environmental behaviours for other socio-de...
aCategories are: adopted the most pro-environmental behaviours (++), adopted slightly fewer (+), adopted much fewer (−) and adopted the fewest (−). -
Frequency of <i>OR</i>s greater than 1 by income at the county level in the U...
CI: confident interval; Percentage was derived by the number of geographic units for low income level divided by the total number of counties at each geographic division. -
r37980778c78--c9baa7e05556188921b827ab004e03b9
Explained inertia by each dimension for group B: Outdoor Index, 2007.
