-
Sample of features by type for the influenza review.
Note: For alphabetic and alphanumeric+ sets, features with an underscore between pairs of words came from titles. For the indexing set, features mainly came from MeSH and... -
r37980778c78--acc5a56128d9ae7b0ab95bf85745bd4d
NA Not Applicable. *The study did not investigate this.1Gives results for trials with discrepancies for ≥1 primary outcome.2Results obtained from 248 of the completed studies. -
Reviewer statements and editorial decisions.
1Probability (“risk”) of a manuscript in this group being published compared to the probability of a manuscript in both other groups. -
The Impact of Funding through the RF President’s Grants for Young Scientists ...
The impact of grants on research productivity has been investigated by a number of retrospective studies. The results of these studies vary considerably. The objective of my... -
r37980778c78--d6d68d1d116135e511bd994212f1cf06
(Notes: RCT: Randomized Controlled Trials; SR: Systematic review; MA: Meta-analysis). -
The results of quality assessment of reporting (n = 312).
The results of quality assessment of reporting (n = 312). -
r37980778c78--9392d345a46126050602b37f262c0581
(Notes: RCT: Randomized Controlled Trials; CSCD: Chinese Science Citation Database; SCI: Science Citation Index). -
The characteristics of awarded and rejected applicants with the CoS or DoS de...
Note: 1Work at a university differs from that at a research institute, mainly, in the need to complement one’s scientific activity with teaching. 2An Russian Academy of... -
Agreement among reviewers regarding recommendations on the publication of eva...
Cohen's kappa for this 3×3 cross table: 0.059 [95%-CI: −0.016–0.134], Spearman's r: 0.17 (p<0.0001). When “accept” and “accept after revision” were condensed into one variable... -
r37980778c78--d2b30ee5d9a720b75a6cb1c7699b3bd8
BackgroundThe quality of reporting in systematic reviews (SRs)/meta-analyses (MAs) of diagnostic tests published by authors in China has not been evaluated. The aims of present... -
Mean performance of the cNB classifier by systematic review and feature set.
aBaseline F3 (%): Ameloblastoma = 40.20; Influenza = 38.96; Galactomannan = 31.00; Malaria = 58.82; Organ transplant = 32.03. All mean F3 values surpassed the baseline values,... -
Aspects of study level publication bias.
1Denominator is the total number of studies with known publication status in the cohort i.e. published plus unpublished plus in preparation plus in press.2Denominator is the... -
Feature set size by systematic review before and after filtering for informat...
aIG = information gain.bSR = systematic review.cA and B refer to random halves of the data. -
Exemplary calculation of the alternative kappa statistic as proposed by Gwet ...
Alternative chance agreement probability: e(y) = 2P1(1-P1). Approximate chance that a rater (A or B) classifies a subject into category “acceptance”. P1 = [(A1+B1)/2]/N.... -
r37980778c78--9790947b4defcb020200bb8c0dd733b5
Note: Count data and values of delta (Δ) were presented as median (25th and 75th percentiles). the p values were calculated based on the results of the comparison of... -
Various measurements of reviewer agreement in three studies involving manuscr...
Positive agreement denotes agreement regarding acceptance, negative agreement refers to agreement regarding rejection of a manuscript. -
Results S1 - Feature Engineering and a Proposed Decision-Support System for S...
Review by Feature Set Results. A more detailed presentation of the performance results for B|A and A|B independent tests, as well as mean performance. Results are presented for...
