11 items found

Tags: Bibliometrics Research assessment Research validity

Filter Results
  • dataset

    Reviewer statements and editorial decisions.

    1Probability (“risk”) of a manuscript in this group being published compared to the probability of a manuscript in both other groups.
  • dataset

    r37980778c78--d28fb58e68fc59080c460cc549529348

    Multiple ordinal regression assessing how parameters hypothesised to reflect consensus predict a rank order of scientific domains (main test: I-physical, II-biological-hard,...
  • dataset

    Reviewer statements.

    N = 554 reviews.
  • dataset

    r37980778c78--1b9ba043ec29488b3dd179480fe25dea

    Search strategies used to identify articles citing each edition of the WOA/WOD in WoS.
  • dataset

    Agreement among reviewers regarding recommendations on the publication of eva...

    Cohen's kappa for this 3×3 cross table: 0.059 [95%-CI: −0.016–0.134], Spearman's r: 0.17 (p<0.0001). When “accept” and “accept after revision” were condensed into one variable...
  • dataset

    Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?

    BackgroundThe number of retracted scientific publications has risen sharply, but it is unclear whether this reflects an increase in publication of flawed articles or an increase...
  • dataset

    r37980778c78--c17e1e5b7ae6b7f6f51a03c8173f7bcc

    This table includes all retracted articles. “Misconduct+Poss. misconduct” includes both “Misconduct” and “Possible misconduct,” which are also analyzed separately. The...
  • dataset

    Using Crowdsourcing to Evaluate Published Scientific Literature: Methods and ...

    Systematically evaluating scientific literature is a time consuming endeavor that requires hours of coding and rating. Here, we describe a method to distribute these tasks...
  • dataset

    Exemplary calculation of the alternative kappa statistic as proposed by Gwet ...

    Alternative chance agreement probability: e(y) = 2P1(1-P1). Approximate chance that a rater (A or B) classifies a subject into category “acceptance”. P1 = [(A1+B1)/2]/N....
  • dataset

    Various measurements of reviewer agreement in three studies involving manuscr...

    Positive agreement denotes agreement regarding acceptance, negative agreement refers to agreement regarding rejection of a manuscript.
  • dataset

    Summary of predictions.

    Predicted correlation of each bibliometric parameter with a field's level of scholarly consensus brief explanation of hypothesised causal mechanism, and studies from which the...