-
Sample of features by type for the influenza review.
Note: For alphabetic and alphanumeric+ sets, features with an underscore between pairs of words came from titles. For the indexing set, features mainly came from MeSH and... -
Reviewer statements and editorial decisions.
1Probability (“risk”) of a manuscript in this group being published compared to the probability of a manuscript in both other groups. -
Distribution of partial credit given to different authors for an imaginary pu...
: The first and corresponding author is the same. #: The last author has been assumed to be the corresponding author. -
r37980778c78--d28fb58e68fc59080c460cc549529348
Multiple ordinal regression assessing how parameters hypothesised to reflect consensus predict a rank order of scientific domains (main test: I-physical, II-biological-hard,... -
The Impact of Funding through the RF President’s Grants for Young Scientists ...
The impact of grants on research productivity has been investigated by a number of retrospective studies. The results of these studies vary considerably. The objective of my... -
The characteristics of awarded and rejected applicants with the CoS or DoS de...
Note: 1Work at a university differs from that at a research institute, mainly, in the need to complement one’s scientific activity with teaching. 2An Russian Academy of... -
An Absolute Index (<i>Ab-index</i>) to Measure a Researcher’s Useful Contribu...
Bibliographic analysis has been a very powerful tool in evaluating the effective contributions of a researcher and determining his/her future research potential. The lack of an... -
Agreement among reviewers regarding recommendations on the publication of eva...
Cohen's kappa for this 3×3 cross table: 0.059 [95%-CI: −0.016–0.134], Spearman's r: 0.17 (p<0.0001). When “accept” and “accept after revision” were condensed into one variable... -
Why Has the Number of Scientific Retractions Increased?
BackgroundThe number of retracted scientific publications has risen sharply, but it is unclear whether this reflects an increase in publication of flawed articles or an increase... -
r37980778c78--c17e1e5b7ae6b7f6f51a03c8173f7bcc
This table includes all retracted articles. “Misconduct+Poss. misconduct” includes both “Misconduct” and “Possible misconduct,” which are also analyzed separately. The... -
Mean performance of the cNB classifier by systematic review and feature set.
aBaseline F3 (%): Ameloblastoma = 40.20; Influenza = 38.96; Galactomannan = 31.00; Malaria = 58.82; Organ transplant = 32.03. All mean F3 values surpassed the baseline values,... -
Feature set size by systematic review before and after filtering for informat...
aIG = information gain.bSR = systematic review.cA and B refer to random halves of the data. -
Exemplary calculation of the alternative kappa statistic as proposed by Gwet ...
Alternative chance agreement probability: e(y) = 2P1(1-P1). Approximate chance that a rater (A or B) classifies a subject into category “acceptance”. P1 = [(A1+B1)/2]/N.... -
r37980778c78--9790947b4defcb020200bb8c0dd733b5
Note: Count data and values of delta (Δ) were presented as median (25th and 75th percentiles). the p values were calculated based on the results of the comparison of... -
Various measurements of reviewer agreement in three studies involving manuscr...
Positive agreement denotes agreement regarding acceptance, negative agreement refers to agreement regarding rejection of a manuscript. -
Results S1 - Feature Engineering and a Proposed Decision-Support System for S...
Review by Feature Set Results. A more detailed presentation of the performance results for B|A and A|B independent tests, as well as mean performance. Results are presented for... -
Summary of predictions.
Predicted correlation of each bibliometric parameter with a field's level of scholarly consensus brief explanation of hypothesised causal mechanism, and studies from which the...
