10 items found

Tags: Bibliometrics Peer Review People and Places

Filter Results
  • publication

    A case study exploring associations between popular media attention of scient...

    The association between mention of scientific research in popular media (e.g., the mainstream media or social media platforms) and scientific impact (e.g., citations) has yet to...
  • publication

    A citation study of earth science projects in citizen science.

    A citation study of a sample of earth science projects in citizen science from the FedCats Catalog was undertaken to assess whether citizen science projects are as productive...
  • publication

    Fair ranking of researchers and research teams

    The main drawback of ranking of researchers by the number of papers, citations or by the Hirsch index is ignoring the problem of distributing authorship among authors in...
  • publication

    Consolidation in a crisis: Patterns of international collaboration in early C...

    This paper seeks to understand whether a catastrophic and urgent event, such as the first months of the COVID-19 pandemic, accelerates or reverses trends in international...
  • publication

    Publications as predictors of racial and ethnic differences in NIH research a...

    This research expands efforts to understand differences in NIH funding associated with the self-identified race and ethnicity of applicants. We collected data from 2,397 NIH...
  • publication

    Evolution or revolution? Changing the way science is published and communicated.

    The Internet is rapidly changing the way the results of academic research are communicated within communities and with the wider public. In a push to accelerate change and make...
  • publication

    Theoretical research without projects

    We propose a funding scheme for theoretical research that does not rely on project proposals, but on recent past scientific productivity. Given a quantitative figure of merit on...
  • publication

    Can editors save peer review from peer reviewers?

    Peer review is the gold standard for scientific communication, but its ability to guarantee the quality of published research remains difficult to verify. Recent modeling...
  • publication

    Reliable novelty: New should not trump true

    Science advances through rich, scholarly discussion. More than ever before, digital tools allow us to take that dialogue online. To chart a new future for open publishing, we...
  • publication

    Productivity, impact, and collaboration differences between transdisciplinary...

    : Transdisciplinary (TD) approaches are increasingly used to address complex public health problems such as childhood obesity. Compared to traditional grant-funded scientific...