-
Comparing secondary outcomes between subgroups of those who did or did not re...
Comparing secondary outcomes between subgroups of those who did or did not receive welfare rights advice or additional benefits (Intervention arm only). -
Cost-utility analysis: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)—base case.
Cost-utility analysis: Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER)—base case. -
r37980778c78--29d79377459db6b2af02a0f145cfaa2c
Primary outcome: CASP-19 scores at baseline, 12 months and 24 months by trial arm using complete cases and multiple imputation (MI). -
r37980778c78--bba5c56d25dc6818a10761b159f12a6e
Baseline data–primary and secondary outcome measures by trial arm. -
r37980778c78--450e21c78f97d642e08d6dc48b28f160
Benefits received and welfare rights advice awarded to intervention arm participants (n = 381). -
Comparing CASP-19 scores at 24 months between subgroups who did or did not re...
Comparing CASP-19 scores at 24 months between subgroups who did or did not receive welfare rights advice or welfare benefits (Intervention arm only). -
Does domiciliary welfare rights advice improve health-related quality of life...
BackgroundThere are major socio-economic gradients in health that could be influenced by increasing personal resources. Welfare rights advice can enhance resources but has not...